(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.08.28 2019나51519

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.08.28 2019나51519

소유권이전등기

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance (the plaintiff did not submit to this court a document containing the specific grounds for appeal after submitting the petition of appeal), and even if the evidence submitted to this court is presented in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance can be deemed legitimate.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal as follows, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of

2. On the third upper part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “F land before division” in the upper part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to read “F land before division”.

The third upper part of the judgment of the first instance and the third part, the 5th part, 6th part, and 10th part of each "O land before division" and the 6th part of the same area at the same time shall be considered as "land before division", respectively.

Pursuant to the lower court’s third bottom of the first instance judgment, “(Law No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992)” is deemed “(amended by Act No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992).”

The 5th upper half of the judgment of the first instance court "the land of this case" shall be deemed to be "the land of this case".

At the 10th bottom of the 5th judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff C, C, and D” shall be read as “Plaintiff B, C, and D”.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed in entirety as there is no reasonable ground.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2019.05.22 2018나52492

-춘천지방법원 2019.05.15 2018나52614

-수원고등법원 2020.07.09 2019나17177

-춘천지방법원 2019.05.15 2018나53518

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2018나85633 (1)