1. The plaintiff (Counter-Defendant) shall deliver the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D’s plastic houses to the defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B.

2...

1. The fact of recognition shall be deemed both a principal lawsuit and a counterclaim;

A. On October 17, 1996, Defendant B purchased the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu plastic greenhouse (hereinafter “instant plastic greenhouse”).

B. On September 201, 201, the Plaintiff directly found the KRW F located in the orchard operated by the Defendants, a couple, and requested Defendant B to use the instant vinyl, which was used by them through the administrative execution of Seoul Metropolitan Government. The Defendants rejected several times, but the Defendants continued to demand that the Plaintiff keep the said vinyl. Ultimately, the Defendants permitted the Plaintiff to temporarily keep the Plaintiff’s goods in the said vinyl around October 201, and agreed at any time as requested by the Defendants, at any time, to put the said vinyl.

C. On October 201, the Defendants found the said vinyl around the end of October, 201, and confirmed that the Plaintiff’s goods had been accumulated more than anticipated, and demanded the Plaintiff to cut the said vinyl. As the Plaintiff did not respond thereto, the Defendants again demanded an explanation around May 201.

On June 25, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) conspired with the Defendant to allow the Plaintiff to use the instant vinyl house which was left alone on or around October 11, 201; (b) caused the Plaintiff to remove wastes in the said vinyl house by taking expenses equivalent to KRW 5,184,00 from October 14, 201 to October 17, 201; (c) around October 20, 201, the Plaintiff was the Plaintiff to remove goods in the said vinyl house; (d) prevented the Plaintiff from using the said vinyl house; and (e) prevented the Plaintiff from using the said vinyl house on or around October 20, 201; and (e) obstructed the Plaintiff’s act of disrupting the Plaintiff’s organic farming and damage of and damage to property by preventing the Plaintiff from entering the said vinyl house; and (e) caused the Plaintiff’s intrusion into the said vinyl house on or around May 14, 2012.