1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

1. The fact that the lawsuit and counterclaim are all deemed to be filed; and

A. On October 11, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a loan agreement for use (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”) with the Defendants on the purport that the Plaintiff would temporarily use the instant vinyl owned by Defendant B for the purpose of keeping the Plaintiff’s goods in custody and return it for the purpose of temporarily using the Plaintiff’s goods.

B. At the end of October, 2011, the Defendants reported that the instant vinyl was accumulated more than expected goods of the Plaintiff in the instant vinyl, and demanded the Plaintiff to remove goods, and that the Plaintiff did not comply therewith. On May 21, 2012, the Defendants notified the Plaintiff that the instant vinyl was handed over until May 26, 2012.

C. On June 25, 2012, the Plaintiff, at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office, conspired with the Defendant to allow the Plaintiff to use the instant vinyl, which was left alone on or around October 11, 201, and, at the expense of 5,184,000 won from October 14, 201 to October 17, 201, caused the Plaintiff to remove garbage located in the instant vinyl, and was unable to use the instant vinyl by preventing the Plaintiff from using the said vinyl, and subsequently, charged the Plaintiff with damaging and destroying the Plaintiff’s organic crops and destroying property, etc. by preventing the Plaintiff from entering the said vinyl, but the Plaintiff’s act of interfering with the Plaintiff’s residence and destroying the Plaintiff’s property and destroying the Plaintiff’s property, etc., on or around October 20, 2011 (around May 14, 2012).

After that, on May 1, 2012, the Plaintiff again made the vinyl part of the instant vinyl house on the ground that Defendant B did not put the instant vinyl in the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office.