1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) The annexed drawings indication 1, 2, 3, 449 square meters of the Won-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C forest land 43,449 square meters, shall be six.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. On July 21, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) on July 21, 201, KRW 43,449 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

D) The clan D shall be the clan of this case.

) After purchasing from others, etc. and completing the registration of ownership transfer on September 12, 2012 (the name of the Plaintiff was “E fishery partnership corporation” at the time of the registration of ownership transfer (the name of the Plaintiff was changed to “E English farming association corporation” on December 26, 2012, and was changed to “E English farming association corporation” on October 7, 2013.

2) The Defendant occupies a vinyl house located in the part (A) written in the claim of the instant land (hereinafter “instant plastic house site”)

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant delivers the instant vinyl site to the Plaintiff, the owner of which. From September 12, 2012, which was the date of the Plaintiff’s acquisition of ownership, to the date of delivery of the instant vinyl site, KRW 564,64, the monthly sought by the Plaintiff due to the return of unjust enrichment from September 12, 201 to September 12, 201, the date of the Plaintiff’s acquisition of ownership (the amount of KRW 10,000,000,000,000 for five years that the Defendant paid from F on November 1, 201, when converting the amount of KRW 166,666 (10,000,000 ¡À60, and less than KRW 50,

(2) On the basis of the foregoing, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the amount of money calculated by converting the unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent of approximately 169.4 square meters (56 square meters) of the instant plastic house site into the unjust enrichment of approximately 564,664 (16,66 won x 169.4/50).

(1) The plaintiff argues that unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent is one million won, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent exceeds 564,664 won, and the plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit). 2. The defendant's argument on February 2.

A. The Defendant asserted that the instant vinyl was leased from F on June 6, 2010, November 1, 2010, and January 201, 201. The instant clan, the former owner of the instant land, used part of the instant land to F for seven years.