A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 20, 2016, the Defendant conspired with C on December 20, 2016, at the main point of “E” operated by Dong C, who is in Jeju City, around 01:00, for the reason that the victim F (45 years of age) who drinks with C was able to communicate with the said C and was able to talk with the said C, and took the head of the victim as his hand, who was a dangerous object on the table table, and took the head of the victim as his hand, while taking the beer disease, which is a dangerous object in the second main point, in his hand, taken the head of the victim as his hand, and her head as soon as possible, and she took the right part of the victim’s face, and she sawed the victim’s face with the saw.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the above C, carried dangerous goods with the victim and carried them about two weeks of medical treatment, led to an open situation where there is no one in two common areas, and where there is no one in common, detailed measures for the body part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A written statement of the F, or a protocol concerning the police interrogation of the F;

1. On-site photographs;

1. CCTV images taken as a result of the reproduction of CCTV images;

1. The medical certificate [in a case where the statements of the witness, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall not be rejected without permission, unless there is any other evidence that is objectively deemed objectively acceptable, and there is no other reliable evidence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2004Do362, Apr. 15, 2005; 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court, the “F” in the written statement, immediately after the occurrence of the instant case, was in line with the “sick and beer.”

Defendant (the president) stated that he had her sold this parcel, and had the same statement in the interrogation of suspect. In this court, I would like to avoid being forced to her to her from the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the beer’s disease.