1. Attached 1-A, Attached 2, Attached 3-5, Attached 6-A, Attached 7-A, and Attached 4-2, and Attached 5.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the complainant of each of the cases listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through No. 16 (hereinafter “each of the instant non-prosecutions case”), and filed a claim for inspection and copying of each of the documents listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through No. 16 (hereinafter “instant information”) with the Defendant.

B. On July 6, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the following purport:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant non-disclosure disposition”). Disclosure of the decision on the non-disclosure portion: Attached 1-A, Attached 3-A, Attached 5-5-A, Attached 6-A, Attached 8-5-A, Attached 11-5-A, Attached 12-5-A, Attached 13-5-A, Attached 14-5-A, Attached 15-4-A, and Attached 16-4-A (hereinafter referred to as “the non-prosecution decision”), and the transfer of each document listed in Attached 2-A (hereinafter referred to as “transfer disposition”), among the information of this case: The rest of each document (hereinafter referred to as the “Information Disclosure Act”)

(3) Article 9(1)4 or 9(1)6 of the Act on the Protection, Protection, etc. of Personal Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection and Information Protection Protection

2. Determination as to the legitimacy of the claim for revocation of a disposition rejecting the disclosure of information concerning each of the documents listed in the Disposition No. 1 of this case

A. 11 ex officio examines the decision of non-prosecution;

In light of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1 and Eul evidence 1, there is no disposition rejecting the disclosure of this part, since the defendant decided to disclose the 11 non-prosecution decision to the plaintiff and notified it to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the part concerning the 11 non-prosecution decision of the instant lawsuit is unlawful.

B. Attached 2 documents.