logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.02.10 2013고단852
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

The crime history room (Defendant A) Defendant A is a person operating a general restaurant in the name of "F" from Gangwon-gun E to the name of "F" from March 15, 2012.

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not put a false indication of the place of origin or put a mark likely to cause confusion thereof, prepare, sell or provide them in disguised manner of the place of origin, store or display them for the purpose of selling or providing them after cooking, or destroying or changing an indication of the place of origin of agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof.

Defendant

A The origin of livestock products is divided into domestic and imported products. In the case of domestic and imported products, the name of the importing country shall be indicated in the case of domestic and imported products, and the country of origin of the chickens used in the cooked food shall be indicated in the packing materials after cooking it in the case of delivery, notwithstanding the fact that on March 17, 2012, the country of origin was indicated in the packing materials, the country of origin of the chickens supplied in the prepared food was indicated in the “F store operated by the Defendant in Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do.” However, on March 17, 2012, the country of origin was determined and sold in the Republic of Korea by making the U.S. chickens’s dressed land supplied by G in the “F store operated by the Defendant in the Gangwon-gun-gun, Gangwon-do, and after cooking it in the instant manner, the country of origin was determined and sold in the Republic of Korea after cooking it in the instant way.

Summary of Evidence (Defendant A)

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A report on investigation (the details of the detection of any false act of selling the country of origin labeling and attaching field photographs);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing GF sales (Defendant A);

1. Article 15 and Article 6 (2) of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines for criminal facts and punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A) is reflective, and there is no criminal record of the same kind.

arrow