logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.12 2015고정1597
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant called “C” in Seo-gu Daejeon.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

However, from April 1, 2015 to July 15, 2015, the Defendant purchased Brain 406km 406km viaout 18 times in total, and sold KRW 5,347,000 in total after cooking 276.6km, 461 mag, in the mersh Newcom, and indicated “100% of the domestic chickens” at the entrance signboard and front door of the business place, and on the packing box for delivery, the Defendant indicated the origin of the chickens by indicating the origin as a domestic acid.

As above, the Defendant purchased brudic cream and cooked and sold the brudic cream in mershin, and indicated the origin of the crudic crub in Korea as a false domestic origin.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the field photographing photographs of the violating enterprise;

1. Relevant Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow