(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.14 2018나2045849

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.14 2018나2045849

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant is modified as follows.

The defendant shall list 1 attached hereto to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the underlying facts is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning for this part is written or added as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) shall be replaced by “Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”)” in the second half to half of the judgment of the first instance, and all Defendant B shall be replaced by “B” (hereinafter “Defendant B”).

On June 13, 2016, the court of first instance shall notify the defendant B of the transfer of the above right and shall notify the above notification on June 13, 2016."

The following shall be added between the three parallels of the first instance judgment and the two parallels of the first instance judgment, and the two parallels of the second two parallels and the lower one parallels of the two parallels:

(g) The Defendant transferred each of the instant real estate from B (the part actually delivered as seen in the front and rear) is the first and second floors of the instant building and the land corresponding to the building area.

(1) On December 19, 2018, the provisional execution of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, which rendered a declaration of provisional execution on December 19, 2018, issued the issuance of each of the instant real estate to Suwon District Court I, and removed from the said real estate."No. 13 of the judgment of first instance, “No. 15, 16, 19,” and “No. 4” were replaced by “No. 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment on the cause of the claim is as follows, and the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance (4 3 e.g., 7 e., e., e., e., 7 e., e., 7 e., e., see

The 5th 6th son of the judgment of the first instance shall be in accordance with the following subparagraphs.

“A lease deposit claim that the Plaintiff acquired from the non-party company (the Defendant against this).

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.03 2020나37842

-서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.09.14 2019누588

-부산고등법원 2020.10.22 2019나57001

-서울고등법원 2019.04.11 2018나2046620

-서울고등법원 2019.06.13 2019나2000997