The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when used or added as follows.

2. 2. 'A fact of recognition' in the 2nd part used or added.

항'을 아래 『』와 같이 고쳐 쓴다.

“B. H, in the position of the head of the management division of the Plaintiff, drafted a lease agreement under which the third floor of the instant building was leased on March 14, 2016, and I, as the head of the Plaintiff’s Republic of Korea, called “B” from March 16, 2016, had been performing the construction of interior and partitions to operate the third floor of the instant building as a public relations center for the purpose of distribution and public relations.” “B,” the Defendant “B” as the Defendant.

3 The 3rd parallel Co., Ltd. “B” shall be put in 3rd parallel Company “B”.

3. The 3rd 7th 7th Roster “Plaintiff” (Defendant (Defendant) of this case shall be written.

4. Note 1, 2, 13, 14, 22 of the 4th parallels “B” shall have been written with the evidence of Nos. 1, 2, 13, 14, 22, and 26 “B”.

5쪽 9행 “기재되어 있었던 점,” 다음에 아래『』를 추가한다.

According to the damage evaluation report (No. 26-3) and the fire site investigation report (Evidence No. 22) attached by the defendant at the time of the application for provisional attachment of this case, the defendant, regardless of whether the plaintiff was actually in an employment relationship with I, regardless of whether the plaintiff was in an employment relationship with I, is sufficient to think that the third floor of the building of this case was leased and carried out by the plaintiff, and five-party 10, "B" leased and "B".

5 5. The place controlled by the Plaintiff “B” has been changed to a place “B” where the construction was in progress.

6 The Court shall have "one parallel of conduct" in the first instance court.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is groundless.