beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff (Law Firm Aststm, Attorneys Cho Yong-ho et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The head of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (Law Firm Ro-Ba, Attorneys Yoon-ok et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
February 25, 2010
The first instance judgment
Incheon District Court Decision 2009Guhap861 Decided August 13, 2009
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of a sewerage charge amounting to KRW 266,312,80 against the Plaintiff on January 5, 2009 shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
The court's explanation on this case is identical to the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Ko Young-han (Presiding Judge)