1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 16, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) the Plaintiff was working in the Maneeman Service Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, Non-Party Co., Ltd.); and (b) the Plaintiff applied for the first medical care benefit to the Defendant on May 6, 2015, in the course of moving the product from the shop on the shop on March 16, 2015 (the instant accident is called the instant accident); (c) the Plaintiff knee and knee knee snee snee snee snee (hereinafter, the instant accident occurred).

B. On June 4, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval on the ground that the Plaintiff’s right-hand knee of the instant wound is not verified (the instant disposition is conducted below).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion after the accident of this case, as a result of the MRI inspection conducted at B Hospital after the accident of this case, he was diagnosed with the right kne kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man. However, the disposition of this case was unlawful on the premise that the

B. (1) After the occurrence of the instant accident, the Plaintiff underwent a X-ray test, etc. on March 25, 2015, which was admitted to C Hospital on March 25, 2015; however, the Plaintiff was only subject to pharmacologic treatment due to the absence of any particular error other than kne

4. 6. The business is kneeeeeek.