beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. At around 02:30 on April 23, 2015, the Plaintiff, an employee of the Defendant, was subject to the occurrence of an accident where the bridge between the former loan automatically operated and the roller, while carrying out the bridge shipping work from Defendant 2 factory 2, which is located in the water village of Sungsung-si, Seosung-si (hereinafter “instant accident”).
B. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff was hospitalized on May 6, 2015, after receiving the diagnosis of the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfyal disease), the (satisfydal disease), and the (satisfy) the (satisfy
At the time of the above treatment, 8C withdrawals had been made on April 28, 2015, but the withdrawals did not amount to April 30, 2015.
C. From May 11, 2015 to June 5, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) filed a normal service with the Defendant Company on June 6, 2015; (b) filed a claim for a kneoman’s certificate during the paid leave on June 6, 2015; and (c) received a diagnosis on the right sleman, a sleman, the right sleper, the right sleper, the right sleke, the right sleke and the pelle, and undergone a re-operation on June 24, 2015.
On June 29, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service branch on the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service on June 29, 2015. However, on June 8, 2015, according to the MDR's opinion, there were observe the MaI's opinion on the alleys, the peltos, the peltos, and the peltosty, and the opinion on blood strokes; however, on June 8, 2015, it was not clear that the peltostrokes of the peltostrokes are diseases; and on April 28, 2015 and April 30, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to the first disposition of medical care benefits on July 21, 2015, where there was no connection with the instant accident, and there was no advice that the RoI's opinion on June 8, 2015 cannot be viewed as diseases caused by the instant accident.
E. After doing so, the plaintiff filed a request for examination with the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, and the advice of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation headquarters is after the accident.