logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.09.19 2018고단587
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Injury;

A. On February 21, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim C: (a) entering the victim C (the victim, 33 years old), who was working at the E main store located in Ma, Masan-si on February 21, 2018, after drinking F and alcoholic beverages into the E main store and worked at the E main store without justifiable grounds; and (b) enter the victim C (the victim, 33 years old).

Magman Dol

“Along with the victim’s inside, 5-6 times the victim’s injury was inflicted on the victim’s inside, 5-6 occasions of drinking, and then, on the ground that the victim was aware of the victim’s inside of the victim due to the victim’s second-time drinking and growth, the victim suffered injury, such as “damage to the diver nature of head,” “damage to the victim’s diver nature,” “in need of approximately 2-day medical treatment,” and “in need of approximately 2-day medical treatment.”

B. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim G, on the ground that he told the Defendant at the same time and place as described in the above paragraph (a), thereby causing injury to the victim G, who was an employee, such as “damage to the dives of head,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by drinking the inside part of the victim G (the age of 26).

2. Around 02:05 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1, the Defendant: (a) was prevented from assaulting by the victim I, who was a police officer of the Gun Military Police Station H police station, dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the above location; and (b) was asked questions about the circumstances of assault; (c) the Defendant expressed that “I would have to go to the police station, I would have to go to the police station, I would have come to go to the police station, and would have come to go to the police station.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as “influence on the left-hand side, influence,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I, C, and G;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to victims and suspect photographic data, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow