beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for four months.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[criminal history] On July 23, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for an injury in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and the execution of the sentence was completed at Daegu Prison on May 21, 2015.
[2016 Highest 2302 - Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B’s name distressed (one-time “H”) considered that the victims of the horses were the victims of the horses to pay the time limit to the said M on November 1, 2015 at the window of Changwon-si around 05:30 on November 1, 2015, the victim G (21 tax), the victim J (20 tax), the victim K (20 tax) and the victim L (20 tax) around the Defendants’ working-out M.
Defendant
A referred to the victims as "I am d. d. d. d. f. f." and followed the victim's face several times, followed by the victim's damage to the victim's G who want to see the land unclaimed, followed by the victim's damage to the ground, and the Defendant B followed the victim's face by the accident, followed by the victim's damage to the victim's h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h., the victim's face by hand, and the victim's name unconf.h. h. h. h. h.
As a result, the Defendants jointly with the victim G with his name infinites, and caused the victimJ to face-to-face, face-to-face, face-face, face-to-face, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim L to face-to-face, face-to-face, light-face, and face-to-face, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, respectively.
[2016 Highest 2951 - Defendant A] The Defendant is a control team against the O who works as an employee at the O restel located in Dong-si, Si around 04:00 on June 23, 2016.
It is the police.
p. Ne.
C. There are multiple times.
“Is that read, “Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that I
Egnetism is Egnetism.
I said that “I am I am I am.”
However, the defendant was not a police officer.
Accordingly, the defendant assumes the qualification of police officer who is a public official and ex officio.