logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.12.09 2014고단2486
사문서위조등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In around 1995, the defendant joined C Co., Ltd. located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and worked as the branch office of the above company's Busan District Office D from 2007, and was in charge of supplying Aluminum panel, etc. to E, a main trader.

1. In 2011, the Defendant forged the test report (TAK-04246) in the name of the president of the Korea Testing and Research Institute (TAK-04246) which arbitrarily recorded the date of receipt, the date of completion of the test, and the date of issuance, using the computer program called “a picture board” which was previously issued at the office of the above Busan branch office, and forged the test report (TAK-04246) in the name of the president of the Korea Testing and Research Institute (TAK-04246) from that time to that time.

2. In 2011, the Defendant: (a) presented forged test results to E at the office of the above Busan branch office in Busan branch office; and (b) exercised each falsified test results on a total of 25 occasions from that time to that of the first 2012 police officers, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the provisions of Chapter 25 of a forged copy of the test report and Chapter 15 of a original test report;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing).

4. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] The scope of final sentence according to the aggravation of multiple offenses by the basic area (6 to 2 months) of category 1 (facing, forging, altering, etc. of private documents): June-3 years [decision of sentence] Defendant’s document pertaining to quality assurance, shall be forged and used.

arrow