logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.07.02 2013가합3563
영업행위금지
Text

1. The defendant shall have the natural release on bail, spawn, and spawn listed in the separate sheet Nos. 61, 63 of the first floor among the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

Reasons

Basic Facts

around 1994, E Co., Ltd. built and sold a building listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

As above, the sales contract prepared by E with the buyer and buyer in the new construction and sale of the commercial building of this case, the type of business for the buyer is in principle the type of business specified in the contract at the time of sale (hereinafter “designated type of business”), and the change of the type of business is stated as the contract terms that the company must obtain prior approval from E.

Plaintiff

A From September 199 to the date of the closure of the argument in this case, from July 1999 to the date of the closure of the argument in this case, Plaintiff B, from July 1998 to July 13 and 13-1 of the shopping mall No. 13 of this case (this case’s store was originally designated as “ precious metals,” but Plaintiff B, from July 25, 2002 to February 201, with the trade name of “G” as stated in the attached Table 2 and precious metal sales business from the same company in this case’s shopping mall No. 13 of this case’s shopping mall No. 1 of this case’s shopping mall No. 6 of this case’s shopping mall No. 1 of this case’s sales business, which had been designated as “ precious metals,” and Plaintiff B, from July 21, 2002 to February 31, 2010, is selling the products of this case’s trade name.

On the other hand, the Defendant’s wife J sold the instant shopping mall and water purifiers No. 63, which is the store designated from June 2002 to October 2002, the designated type of business from around October 2002, and the Defendant, around October 2002, had registered the business of “L” with the trade name of “L” in the name of “L” in the name of the head K at the above store, and had operated the business of “L” with the trade name of “L”. The Defendant, from June 8, 2005, operated the business in the name of the Defendant.

arrow