1. Defendant C indicated the Plaintiff B with a map No. 1 among the outer walls of G apartment No. 1 floor H in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 1.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A is the owner of Hhoho, Kho, Lho, Mho, Nho, and Plaintiff B among the instant commercial buildings located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, the main complex building (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) in Seongdong-gu, Seoul. Each of the commercial buildings owned by the Plaintiffs is located in the first floor of the instant commercial buildings, and Hho, Hho, Hho, K, K, and L are adjacent to the front outer wall of the instant commercial building.

(see the following drawings):

Defendant Q carries on the restaurant business in the name of “I” under the title of “B” among the outer walls of this case owned by Plaintiff B, and among the outer walls of this case owned by Plaintiff B, the separate drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 3, 4, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 7, 1, 1, 7, 2, 7, 2, 8, 8, 2, 2, 2, 8, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 5, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8 (including each number)

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiffs’ assertion on the outer wall of the instant commercial building constitutes a common area and matters concerning its management shall be decided by the ordinary resolution of the management body. On the upper part of the outer wall of the first floor of the instant commercial building, there is an implied resolution of the management body that the owner of the instant condominium building installs the signboard.

However, the signboards set up by the Defendants are each of the above resolutions.