logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.03 2017고합372
특수공무집행방해치상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 12, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) and the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages (hereinafter referred to as “motor”) driven the CT100 Oral Sea owned by the Defendant, who did not purchase mandatory insurance at approximately 800 meters away from the 5rd 5rd Dool-ro, Seoul Southern-gu, Seoul, without a motor engine bicycle driver’s license on April 12, 2017 to the front 3:20m of the same day.

2. On April 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven the above CT100 Obane on April 23:20, 2017; (b) was on the front road in front of the Seoul Southernbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (c) was found to have been working for drinking control by the head of the police station D belonging to the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station D, Seoul, where he was working for drinking control at the above place to stop the Defendant’s prior vehicle and then to measure drinking, etc.

At the time, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.03% in blood, and was driving under the influence of a license without permission, so he was able to escape.

Defendant 1 cited the alcohol measuring instrument and the mine wing, and attempted to demand the Defendant to take a dial and stop and pulmonary measurement. As is, Defendant 1 escaped to the opposite direction after the center line of the road was obstructed by the above Oratob, and Defendant 1 proceeded with the victim’s left side bridge due to the front of the above Oratob, even though Defendant 1 obstructed the above Orab, F (49) developments leading up to the Seoul Southern Police Station D's department belonging to the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station (Ch 49).

In this process, the Defendant driving the above Baba, which is a dangerous object, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the victim concerning the crackdown on drinking driving, and suffered injury to the victim, such as the 5-day left-hand flaba, which requires treatment for about 5 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. A written statement prepared by E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. CCTV video recording CDs;

1. Each existing evidence referred to in subparagraphs 1 and 2 that has been seized;

1. The part and degree of injury in the judgment;

arrow