logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.23 2013고정3399
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Seoul Central District Court 2012Kahap742, which was proceeding against D, and testified after he appeared as a witness of the lawsuit claiming damages against D.

1. In fact, the Defendant responded to the question of the Plaintiff’s agent’s “I wish that I will soon terminate the contract with the Culult while Sult as soon as possible in connection with the E’s high-functional film production project, and that I will work with the D before the end of the year 2011,” but repeated several times to E, the Defendant asked the Plaintiff that “I will soon terminate the contract with the Cult and call to the Defendant’s project,” and that “I will good if I will work with the approval of the project as soon as possible as I would like to do so,” and the witness responded to the questions of the presiding judge’s “I will promptly terminate the contract with the Cult,” and “I will not answer the Plaintiff that I will “I will promptly terminate the contract with the Plaintiff,” and “I will not answer the Plaintiff’s answer to the questions of the Plaintiff’s agent “I will soon advance the contract and I will immediately terminate the contract.”

2. The Defendant was aware of the fact that E, prior to the repeated demand for the Defendant’s repeated departure from employment, was to terminate the contract for the work with the previous workplace of the Culendian prior to the delay in 2011, through telephone conversations with E. However, the Defendant was aware of the fact that “A witness was aware of the fact that the Plaintiff terminated the contract for the Culendian, at any time, he was aware of the fact that the Plaintiff had changed the contract for the work with the Coul subcontractor, and the witness was aware of such fact.”

arrow