The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The Defendant, on January 21, 2014, is punished for perjury in cases where he was present at the court of Seoul Central District Court Branch of Seocho-gu, Seoul District Court 458, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, as a witness, in relation to the case of claiming a return of agreed amount between the above court of 2012Ga 313359, C and Defendant D, and is given testimony contrary to memory.

The letter was drawn.

1) The Defendant “as the Plaintiff entered into a contract”

D's seal impressions with the head of the office and the certificate of the seal impressions must be stated.

The Plaintiff’s agent’s “I did not talk that I will have for the contract”.

I testified as ", if so, to what extent he had."

“The Plaintiff entered into a contract,” “The employee would have to know the status of the employee, as the employee is in progress, if he/she entered into a contract.”

“The testimony was made.”

However, the defendant knew that the complainant had the name of D and the certificate of seal imprint for the contract.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2) The Defendant stated at the law firm E office that “Defendant D did not know about the partnership business contract with the Plaintiff.”

The Plaintiff’s agent testified as “for example,” and “at any time and how you talk.”

“A witness was drawn up on the spot”’s inquiry by the Plaintiff’s agent

F and G contract was sent to the attorney-at-law office, and there was the name of D in the process of amending this contract at the attorney-at-law office, and why is why is the business operator's name, and two persons of G and D have entered into the contract first, and it was said that the contract was concluded, and that D was the employee.

“The testimony was made.”

However, the facts are.