logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.22 2016누30974
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception that the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is higher than that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The defendant in the second sentence 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as the "the Commissioner of the Chungcheong Police Agency".

The defendant in the third third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is moving "the President" to "the President".

The defendant in Part 9 of the fourth decision of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as the "the Commissioner of the Chungcheong Police Agency".

The fourth 10th th 10th 10th s. “(2) of the first 10th 10th s. “(4) of the first 10th s.B.” part of the judgment on the ground that the Plaintiff did not appeal even though the previous administrative litigation was rendered against the Plaintiff on May 29, 2014, this part of the judgment became final and conclusive at that time, and ③ the Plaintiff was subject to the lapse of one year from November 18, 2013 when the previous appeals review committee rendered a decision on the

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow