logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.22 2017누79372
체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of some contents as follows. As such, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

In addition, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be sentenced to "No. 2, 201.12" for each part of the 2th 4th, 4th 18th 18th 18th 201.

Each "in this court" of the fourth and seventh acts of the first instance court's decision shall be "in the court of first instance" in the court of first instance.

The "employee" in Part 14 of the decision of the court of first instance shall be the "employee".

The "Immigration Control Act" in the 2 and 3th sentence of the judgment of the first instance court shall be raised as the "Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act".

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow