logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.13 2016가합200099
토지인도
Text

1. The Defendant indicated in the attached Table 1 list Nos. 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14 to the Plaintiff, as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 5, 6, and 14.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 17, 2012, the Defendant concluded a removal service agreement with the non-party corporation, the former owner of each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”). On March 27, 2012, the Defendant concluded a removal service agreement with the non-party corporation, the total of KRW 56,00 for construction cost of KRW 56,00,000 for each of the instant lands, including 4th and underground 1st, 3rd and upper-rise buildings, 2nd and 2nd and 1st and warehouse bonds, which are the buildings on each of the instant lands, and completed the removal service agreement with the non-party corporation on March 27, 2012.

B. The Defendant currently connects each point of (B) part of the attached Table 2, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13 and 14, among the lands listed in attached Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, among the lands listed in attached Tables 1 and 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14, the Defendant installs a facility, such as a ground container, which connects each point of (a) part of the land listed in attached Tables 2, 2, 3, 4, and 14, and occupies each of the instant land.

C. On February 10, 2012, Epir TV Co., Ltd. entered into a real estate security trust agreement on each of the instant land with an asset trust in Scco Coco Co., Ltd.

On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff acquired each of the instant land from the Coco Asset Trust Co., Ltd. by public sale, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 19, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), 3, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of each of the instant land, and the Defendant occupies each of the instant land by installing temporary fences and container warehouses on each of the instant land. As such, the Defendant collected all of the instant temporary fences and container warehouses, etc. from the Plaintiff.

arrow