1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are deemed legitimate in light of the evidence submitted to the court of first instance

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the first instance court's 6th instance court's 6th instance court's 4th instance court's 6th instance court's 6th instance court's 6th instance court's 6th instance court's 6th instance court's 6th instance court's 9th instance court's 9th instance court's 9th "(1)."

However, there are new arguments that the plaintiff did not in the first instance trial and that the court repeatedly emphasizes in particular, since the plaintiff's assertion that he was based on the grounds of appeal is a new argument that was not in the first instance trial, the following judgments should be added.

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiff notified the fact that the personnel committee was held immediately before the plaintiff's leave, and notified the change of the date of the personnel committee during the plaintiff's leave period, and the dismissal in this case asserts that the procedural defect which deprived the plaintiff's right to defense is null and void.

Therefore, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in No. 13-1 and No. 13-2, the Defendant sent the Plaintiff e-mail to the personnel committee to be held at the conference room on February 15, 2017, along with the purport that “the Plaintiff was submitted to the Plaintiff at the conference room on March 2, 2017.” The time when the personnel committee was held on February 27, 2017 changed from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on March 2, 2017.

‘The fact that the notice was given' can be recognized.

As such, insofar as the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on February 15, 2017, which was two weeks before March 2, 2017, the fact that the Personnel Committee was held on February 2, 2017, the period between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s leave and holiday, there is time to prepare the vindication and explanatory materials for the Plaintiff.