1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

(a) The Governor of the Gyeonggi-do shall publicly notify the designation of an urban development zone and establish an association (1) on March 21, 2013, the Gyeonggi-do public notice of the designation of the urban development zone is 52,580 square meters per day of Pyeongtaek-siF (hereinafter “instant zone”).

(2) The Defendant held an inaugural general meeting on April 27, 2013 and obtained authorization for the establishment of an urban development project from the head of Pyeongtaek-si on November 15, 2013 to implement an urban development project of the instant zone.

3) The Plaintiffs are both the Defendant’s union members and representatives who belong to the board of representatives. (b) On February 11, 2014, the Defendant sent to the union members a registered mail stating that “the first general meeting shall be held on March 22, 2014, 10:30 :30 :0 :30 :0 :0 am on March 22, 2014, 201; hereinafter “the first case”) of the resolution for the formulation of a development plan (hereinafter “the first case”); and (c) of the articles of association (hereinafter “the second case”); and the first general meeting shall be held by adding the first and two agenda items to “each case of this case”). The Defendant publicly announced to the same effect.”

2) The explanatory materials (No. 13 No. 3A No. 7) presented to the members at the ordinary meeting are also the same materials as the evidence of No. 13 A, but the binding order differs.

According to the above, the average land burden rate is about 54.3%, which is calculated on the basis of the area calculated on the basis of the size of the area. [The above explanatory materials are indicated as the "land rate calculation (area calculation)" in the part 6 of the above explanatory materials.

[2] Meanwhile, the Defendant stated in the above explanatory materials the average land burden calculation formula in accordance with the evaluation formula. However, the portion of the "total project cost" in the calculation formula is deemed to erroneously state the "total project cost/ (total appraised value of the land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay)" (see Article 26 (4) 1 of the Enforcement Rule of the Urban Development Act, i.e., Article 26 (4) of the Enforcement Rule of the Urban Development Act, and the "final burden calculation" in each state shall be based on the evaluation formula due