A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2014, while the Defendant leased and used a car Aridi A8 car from Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. around 2012, the Defendant delayed rent from June 2014, and the Defendant’s wife, the guarantor, demanded to pay the rent, entered the Defendant’s demand to pay the rent, and he thought that the Defendant was not in the F Branch Office of the above company’s F Branch Office located in the fourth floor of the Seoul Gangdong-gu E building.

around 15:40 on September 24, 2014, the Defendant purchased gasoline equivalent to KRW 10,00 from the gas station located near the above company office, and entered the above company office where 20 employees, including G, etc., work for 15:50 on the same day, and entered the company office where 20 employees, such as G, etc., work, “I am off and off this door. I do not am. I do not am. I do not am. I do not am. I am. I am. I am. I do not am. I am. I do not am. I do am. I do am. I do am. I do am. I do am.) which was prepared as above while I tried to put the gasoline on the floor, and put it on the floor by putting it down on the floor by using a portable gater (

Accordingly, the defendant reserves the fire prevention of a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of each existing Act and subordinate statute of one gasoline tank (No. 1), a disposable-use theater (No. 2) that has been seized;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act is the case where the defendant prepared fire prevention by taking actions to spawn gasoline in the office of the F branch office of Hyundai Capital Capital Co., Ltd. in order to attach a fire as a base. The above fire prevention crime is likely to seriously threaten public safety and peace and cause serious damage to human life and property. Thus, the defendant's liability cannot be deemed to be light.

However, the defendant stated that he would pay rent demand by Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd.