logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.08.24 2014가단134980
채무부존재확인
Text

1. With respect to an accident indicated in the attached Form, the attached Form shall be indicated by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) as to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

1. In full view of the descriptions of Gap's underlying facts and the purport of the entire pleadings (including the fact that there is no dispute), the following facts are recognized:

B On July 19, 2008, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.19% on blood alcohol content at 05:50%, the Defendant driven a CST5 vehicle volume (hereinafter “victim”) with the insurer of the automobile comprehensive insurance (hereinafter “victim”) and driven the access lamps to be flowed in the direction of the friest 4758, the friest 4758, the friest erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogs in the front where the grith erogic erogtic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic e (hereinafter “victim”).

On July 19, 2008, the Defendant, who was aboard the damaged vehicle at the time of the instant accident, was diagnosed by the G Hospital that was hospitalized at the time of the instant accident, on a clinical basis that the left-hand shoulder, light salt, and light salt are presumed to have been presumed to have been clinically, and that there may be a change in the name and period of diagnosis depending on the close inspection and symptoms, and received a diagnosis from the H Hospital hospitalized at the time of August 14, 2008 that the light salt and tension, and the cerebrumum are presumed to have been clinically presumed.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. (1) The plaintiff's assertion (1) The defendant alleged that the accident of this case occurred only through the minor background, such as the left-hand satum satum, the satum satum, and the satum satum satum satum, but is claiming damages against the plaintiff on the ground of symptoms not related to the accident of this case, such as two satum s

(2) The Defendant alleged that he suffered a significant impact on his head due to the instant accident, and the two copies of the instant accident and the treatment period have been prolonged, resulting in depression and stress disorder. Ultimately, the Defendant suffered emotional distress.

arrow