logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.20 2017가단5050931
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 23, 2016, the original metal Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “original metal”) entered into an automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Defendant, an insurance company, as the insured of the original metal, with respect to the vehicle C owned by the original metal (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. D, around 12:05 on August 13, 2016, when driving the instant vehicle, and driving the instant vehicle on the front side of the bus bus stops located in 431 Macheon-ri, Macheon-ri, Macheon-ri, Man-ri, Man-si, in the front side of the bus stops located in the front side of the Mancheon-ri, Ma, the central line was obstructed, and the middle side of the driver’s seat of the E-K 3 vehicle driven in the front part of the driver’s seat of the instant vehicle, collision with the front part of the driver’s seat

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

A first-aid worker belonging to the 119 Safety Center, who was called up immediately after the instant accident, transferred D to the emergency room of G hospital located near the same day at around 12:50 on the same day.

G A doctor affiliated with the G hospital immediately conducted the two CT shooting and MRI shooting on D, and administered a liquid dye, the blood exclusive dye, and transferred D to the Seoul Asan Hospital on the same day, with the view that a sudden brain salutism, the salute color on the left side side of the serious brain salute, a serious brain salute, etc. was generated.

D On August 16, 2016, at the Seoul Asan Hospital, 2016, 2000, 2000 the left-hand ke pressure and blood spam removal surgery was conducted under the cerebral typhism diagnosis, but 300 death on the 26th day of the same month.

E. The Plaintiffs are parents of D.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 3 through 6 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and images, the results of the request for appraisal of medical records to the Director of the Seoul Medical Research Institute of Law and Law and the fact-finding inquiry results, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs asserted that they are parties to the instant vehicle due to the instant accident.

arrow