1. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant filed a claim for the revocation of dismissal disposition C between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. Details of the decision of this case

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates the D University, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was appointed to the D University on March 1, 1997, and served as a professor in English and English language at the D University.

B. On December 30, 2013, the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee of the Korea University decided to dismiss an intervenor due to the grounds for disciplinary action as set forth below, and the Plaintiff issued a dismissal disposition on January 24, 2014 for the foregoing reasons (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”).

Although the intervenor acknowledges the inappropriate relationship with the people in general service for the number of years and appeals against the deep reflector and preference, it is necessary to maintain more strict dignity in that it requires more strict value standards and actions as an educator, and that it is a professor who must investigate academic support and educational principles and teach students in full-time education.

I would like to say.

Nevertheless, the intervenor's act has established a Buddhist relationship with a female professor by taking advantage of the superior position of professor, which is, it is not a violation of the duty of good faith as a professor, but a serious violation of its nature and dignity.

Therefore, the intervenor's decision to dismiss the intervenor in violation of the relevant regulations (Article 61 of the Private School Act, Article 3 of the Service Regulations, Article 34 of the Teachers' Personnel Management Regulations) by committing improper acts and injury to dignity as a professor.

C. On February 20, 2014, the Intervenor filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking revocation of the instant dismissal disposition, and the Defendant filed the same year.

4. 30. 30. Recognizing the Intervenor’s improper act and injury to dignity, the Intervenor, as an educator, has contributed to the improvement of the academic achievement and educational activities of students at school during the past 17 years.