1. On October 10, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision in the case of the revocation of the dismissal disposition C between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

(2) On June 26, 2018, the Intervenor demanded a disciplinary resolution to the Intervenor’s teachers’ disciplinary committee, and on June 26, 2018, the said disciplinary committee issued a dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on June 29, 2018 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[A] On May 19, 2017, the Plaintiff explained the characteristics of a male and female’s body (at the same time, her am, chest, etc.) to the students during the class hours of “engineering basic course” between G and the first year, and made an inappropriate statement to a level that female students could feel sexually refused, and later, female students F (at the same time, 198 students; hereinafter “victims”) going back to the religious order, and all of the students (at least 30 students) were able to return the victim students back to the religious order, the Plaintiff asked the students who take lessons to “whether the difference between her own and female students is?” and had them compare their body with the victim students.

* The Plaintiff’s improper remarks, etc. - The Plaintiff explained about the difference between her chest and her female and female females before her, and made a statement about the reason why her female more care than her male and the selection of female females, such as clothes, teas, cremation, etc. - - - the Plaintiff’s selection of a victim student and return her clothes to a different religious order - after her selection of a victim student so that she can see the victim student’s side appearance and the victim student’s side appearance - After her selection of a victim student, the Plaintiff made an inappropriate statement while her class and led a victim student to sexual humiliation.

(hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Reason”). C.

The petition review claim and the defendant's decision-making plaintiff filed a petition review with the defendant seeking the revocation of the disposition of this case, but the defendant's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim on October 10, 2018.