1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 1, 2004, the Plaintiff was newly appointed to C University established and operated by the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) and served as an associate professor in the service management department.

B. On July 25, 2014, the Intervenor dismissed the Plaintiff on the grounds of the grounds as delineated below.

(hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”). The Plaintiff asserted the false fact that his father-child’s father-child (FF) is a professor at the same school of the same level, thereby impairing the honor of D, C, and C, and B, and breached the duty of maintaining teachers’ dignity.

C. On August 27, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking the revocation of the instant dismissal disposition, but the Defendant dismissed the petition on November 5 of the same year.

(hereinafter referred to as “examination and decision of this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the review and decision of this case is legitimate

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was made by the Plaintiff, 2013, hereinafter “C University H I’s first university H, with the same meaning as the Plaintiff’s new faculty member, and C University H had four professors as J president, Plaintiff, G (Nam) professor and K professor.

As the professor of G (Nam) has been appointed, the issue of morality of university H was raised in the public interest level for schools and corporations; the issue was not leaked until D professor conducted a gene test; the relationship between D professor and G (Nam) professor was not discussed after I was notified by D professor (hereinafter “Inspector”); the Plaintiff raised doubt about the purchase of the Seoul Center at C University; and the president of JC University covers the case after the Plaintiff raised a problem.