logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.12.10 2020고단4516
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2, 2020, around 01:10 on October 2, 2020, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s repair cost of KRW 1,426,000, such as: (a) PCX125 Oba, the victim’s owner D, who was parked in the building C, to remove the victim’s PCX125 Oba in front of the building C, and to remove the victim’s PCX125 Oba, which is the owner of the building D; and (b) the victim’s PC

2. At around 02:00 on the same day, the Defendant committed assault by 112 at the above place, stating that “the first floor of an officetel and the main studs are fluor who fluor in front of the building and are fluoring with the city expenses.” On the one hand, the Defendant was urged to return home from a slope G slope by the police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the House, the House, the House, the House, the House, the House, the House, the House, and the House, the House, the House, the House, the House, and the House, the House, the House, the House

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement of the defendant concerning the defendant's legal statement G, such as the F District Work Hours, the site photograph, etc., the victim's fat-fat-fat photograph photograph, the victim's fat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-c

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to property), the choice of each fine (the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and is contrary to the recognition of the crime of this case, the first crime, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim of causing damage

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow