logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고단772
무고교사
Text

Defendant

U is a fine of KRW 7 million, Defendant Y, AA, and AC are punished by each fine of KRW 5 million, Defendant V, X, Z, AB, A, and D.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

U on March 13, 2012, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year and two months to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence), and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 19, 2012.

Defendant

Y On June 11, 2009, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and confirmed on November 26, 2009. On January 18, 2013, the Daegu District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and confirmed on January 26, 2013.

Defendant

On May 16, 2012, AA was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on May 16, 201 and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 19, 2012.

Defendant

On February 22, 2012, AC was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on February 22, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 2012.

1. Although the facts of Defendant U, V, and W U did not have purchased visual visibility from the next Defendant V, they should create one of the instant cases in a case where the Defendant V, who had visited himself at the meeting room No. 12 of the Daegu Correctional Institution on November 25, 2009, when he was in confinement in the Daegu Correctional Institution, “at the meeting room No. 12 of the Daegu Correctional Institution,” or even if he had to go back to another correctional institution, he would have to create one of the instant cases. Accordingly, the Defendant V, who had sold his visual visibility of KRW 3 million, requested that he do not return the visual visibility of KRW 3 million. In addition, on December 9, 2009, he had the said V and the Defendant W, who was in charge of the communication room No. 9 of the Daegu Correctional Correctional Institution, urge him to promptly file a complaint with the police officer on November 25, 200, and had the Defendant V, who was in charge of UV, submit his false criminal punishment to the police officer on February 1, 2000.

arrow