logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.11.17 2017고정422
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. located in Jeju City B.

No person shall receive any subsidy or indirect subsidy by filing a false application or by any other unlawful means.

When the Defendant came to know that he could receive subsidies from the relevant employment center when he/she operates a small and medium enterprise’s youth employment internship program in the Ministry of Labor (employment center) and by concluding a internship agreement to provide an intern employee with the entrusted operation of the business through the relevant operating agency, he/she would receive subsidies from the relevant employment center. As such, the Defendant prepared the standard internship support agreement and other documents as if he/she had the employee directly employed and worked as the intern employee through the lawsuit of the Jeju Commercial conference, which is the operating agency, and applied for subsidies by unlawful means.

On May 19, 2014, the Defendant, who had already been employed and worked in the Defendant’s office, was arranged at the Jeju Commercial Conference, and had the employee D employed as an intern and worked as an intern from June 10, 2014 to October 31, 2014, and submitted the application form, etc. to the Jeju Commercial Conference, thereby denying supply of KRW 3,760,000 at the Gwangju Employment Center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation of the police against the defendant (including attached documents);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that he received a subsidy without knowing that he was not qualified as an intern because he was unable to receive guidance on his eligibility to participate in the internship at the time of 2014.

However, according to each evidence of the judgment, the person who was directly submitted by the defendant at the time of the police investigation on the 11th page of the "Guidelines for the Implementation of the Youth Employment Finding System of Small and Medium Enterprises in 2014" shall be the person who had worked for training, employment, or special cases under the Military Service Act in the company employing the internship prior to the date of application

arrow