logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.09.14 2018고정273
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is the actual operator of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. 1110.

No person shall receive any subsidy or indirect subsidy by filing a false application or by any other unlawful means.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant came to know that he was able to receive subsidies from the relevant employment center in the event that he was employed as an intern employee by concluding a internship agreement to receive the internship employee through the operating agency that operated the business entrusted with the business, and that he was able to receive subsidies from the relevant employment center in the event that he was employed as a full-time employee by being converted into a full-time employee, the Defendant prepared the documents such as the standard internship support agreement, etc. as if he had a worker being directly employed and worked as an intern employee through the management agency (State) E, which is the operating agency, and intended to receive the subsidies by applying for the standard internship support agreement and the full-time conversion subsidy.

(1) Although the Defendant directly recruited employees F and had them work from January 9, 2012, the Defendant received the F from the KIN and had them work as an intern from May 22, 2012 to November 21, 2012, and had them work as an intern. The Defendant falsely prepared an application for the internship subsidy, etc. and submitted it to the (ju) E, and received from the branch office of the Seoul East-gu Seoul Labor Office’s Seoul Labor Office subsidies of FF’s internship subsidy of KRW 3,99,960 and subsidies for full-time conversion of KRW 3,90,000.

(2) Although the Defendant directly recruited G workers and had them work from November 22, 2012, the Defendant received a recommendation from the K-A-A-U-U-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U.

(3) The Defendant directly employs workers H and had them work from November 19, 2012.

arrow