logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.10.16 2018고정703
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim B, using a special typology called “book” with C, D, E, and one-time “book” (in the back of the page, the number of marbing material components is changed) and an article wearing a special siren to distinguish it, and conspired to raise profits from gambling participants, E manages the entire marbling, and provides special typation, and C participates in the “marbing” in accordance with the direction of E, and C and D share their respective roles to take part in the warehouse where the marbling players and the Defendant are punished for the gambling.

On September 10, 2016, the Defendant, C, D, and E participated in approximately 10 persons, such as victim B, etc., in the second floor of the housing located near the F of the Geum-gu, Busan around Sep. 10, 2016, and used approximately 52 copies of special chemicalization 52.

E manages the entire gambling board at the same place, and C and D am money depending on the sign chosen by the article’s name not bearing a special siren, and the Defendant, as warehouse head, served as “one head (which divided into two parts)” and carried out a gambling, and the victim B who did not know of it lost an amount of KRW 1.5 million.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C, D, and E, by deceiving the victim and committing fraud, acquired the money equivalent to KRW 1.5 million by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant and E did not inform the victim G who want to lose money to gambling by getting off a large number of money to allow the victim G to participate in gambling again by citing that “the victim would have engaged in gambling by using a special siren capable of identifying the satisfat, and the article to be known to the article.” The Defendant and E did not inform the victim of the fact that he did not run gambling using an article wearing a special siren at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, and did not inform the victim of the person who used a special siren.

arrow