(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고단787

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고단787

사기방조

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Part 3 (No. 1) of the seized speculative investment shall be confiscated from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around May 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was called "C"; (b) around 22:00 to 3-4 hours from the same day, at his house located in Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as "C"), approximately 12:15 persons, including the victim E, sitd up in the original form; and (c) took part in the gambling for about 3-4 hours from 22:00 to 3-4 hours from the same day; and (d) provided the fluor, fluor, fluor, coffee, etc. with money in the name of "gluor" in the course of gambling, and (e) lent money in the form of "gluor" using the said money. In the course of the gambling, the victim lost KRW 9.5 million.

However, the Defendant was aware of the fact that, in the course of gambling, the injured party was aware that he was aware of the fact that, in response to the Defendant’s request for the replacement of a string of abnormal behavior, such as photographing a video image, the Defendant was resisted from the injured party in the course of recovering the existing string (the Chapter 3 in Chapter 6, the Chapter 3 in Chapter 3, and the Chapter 3 in the case of other victims G were divided into evidence) and signed to the effect that he agreed on the part of the string (the number divided into evidence). Furthermore, in addition, in the back of the string of the 200,000 won provided to G to the injured party of other fraud, the Defendant was aware of the fact that a certain sign, such as the number corresponding to the string, is written as a special paint, and that if he wears a special string, he could be recognized.

Defendant 1, by means of the aforementioned manner, had been able to facilitate the uninfluent accomplice’s act of “influence of fraud” as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of E and G;

1. Part concerning the defendant's statement E in the suspect interrogation protocol

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Each police statement made to E, G, and H;

1. Complaint;

1. Seized articles (Tropical 3 pages);

1. Investigation report (related to the identification of the speculation submitted by the victim);

1. Photographs;

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2018.01.26 2017노1581

-광주지방법원 2021.02.24 2020고단5624

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.09.18 2018고단181

-제주지방법원 2016.03.25 2016고단121

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.21 2017고단476