logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.05.02 2012고정388
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:00 on April 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) cut off the victim D (the 22 years of age, n, n) on an on-road parking lot in front of the Redcheon-gun C cafeteria, with one cM card, one cke card, one cke card for a new bank, one cke card for a national bank, two cke card for a national bank, one 150,000 won in cash, and one cM wall for a market value equivalent to 2.50,000 won in market value, which includes a resident registration certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement that the defendant has taken the wall of the first trial record;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. CCTV-cap photographs;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and defense counsel of investigation report (the details of the victim's physical cards attached thereto), investigation report (the investigation of telephone conversations for reference) (the victim's physical cards E.

1. The gist of the assertion was that the Defendant stolen the victim’s wallet, but only 13,00 won was entered within the wallet, and there was no other damage claimed by the victim.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, namely, the victim consistently and specifically stated the amount of cash contained in the victim's wall from the investigative agency to this court, the name and quantity of the victim's wall card, etc., and the victim's statement at police, E's telephone conversations, and the victim's physical card description are consistent with the victim's statement. The victim's statement is reliable. According to the CCTV photograph at the time of this case, the victim's photograph was found to have no one other than the defendant at the location where the victim's wall was faced until the victim's wall was faced, and the defendant knew that the victim's wall was similar in the shape to the victim's female-friendly wall wall so that the victim's wall was known to a female-friendly room.

arrow