The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On February 3, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant used a DNA “B” online portal site to the Internet portal site at a closed place on February 15:51, 2016, and used the Internet portal site “B” [C] article / [C] rather than being subject to a list, and the Gu/Si/Gun forces, who were unable to memory between A and B and C in a mental illness, were unable to associate with his/her mental disorder, and thus, the Defendant abused the victim D by openly putting a written reply.

2. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged in the judgment: The judgment dismissing a public prosecution for the withdrawal of a victim's complaint on May 15, 2017, which is after the institution of public prosecution under Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act).