logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.12 2015고단2188
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties in Gyeyang Branch of the District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 25, 2010.

1. On February 20, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on February 20, 2010, placed an order for alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol to the victim under the “E” operated by Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Victim D (M, 46 years of age) as if he would pay the alcohol value.

However, even if the defendant was provided with alcoholic beverages, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was provided by the victim with a total of KRW 80,00,000, including KRW 15,000 for beer, and KRW 20,000 for singing, KRW 20,00 for singing, and KRW 25,00 for volunteer service charges.

2. On February 25, 2010, at around 04:22, the Defendant: (a) boarded G taxi driven by the Victim F (Age 59) in the Jung-gu Seoul Central District, Jung-gu, Seoul; and (b) caused the Defendant to operate a taxi as if he would pay the victim the taxi fee.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim operate a taxi up to the subway station of subway No. 4 located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, which is the destination, thereby being provided with taxi services equivalent to 15,000 won.

3. On February 26, 2010, the Defendant: (a) 01:45 on February 26, 2010, driven by the victim H (5 years of age) in the vicinity of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central District, and was engaged in driving a taxi as if he would pay the victim a taxi fee.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim operate a taxi up to five Doro-ro in Jung-gu in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, which is a destination, and received services equivalent to 6,120 won of taxi rates.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D, F, and H;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow