logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.25 2015고단1030
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and for a defendant B, for a period of ten months.

The defendant A shall provide the seized evidence No. 4.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants agreed to steal a mobile phone from one side as far as many people walk and walk, and Defendant A conspired to play the role of “fluor” in the Handphone, etc., and Defendant B conspired to take the role of “fluor” in the Handphone, etc. when Defendant A steals a Handphone, Defendant A conspired to take the role of “fluor” in the burging line with the clothes or newspapers, when Defendant A steals a handphone.

1. Special larceny;

A. On February 12, 2015, the Defendants discovered the victim D who walked on the road in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul on the front side of the “F” in Gangnam-gu, and Defendant B cut off the front line by putting the clothes even after the left side of the said victim, and Defendant A cut off the front line, and Defendant A, who was in the victim’s right side cover, took one galle thmno-2 mobile phone at the market price equivalent to KRW 900,000,000,000, in a group.

B. The Defendants continued to commit the crime against the victim G at the same place on the same day, at around 20:50 on the same day, discovered the victim G who was walking on the road, and in such a way as above, cut off one unit of the victim’s market value equivalent to KRW 880,00,00, in a group of gallon No Nogno-4 mobile phones in a size equivalent to KRW 880,00,00.

2. From 21:05 on the same day as described in paragraph (1), the Defendants continued to find out the victim H who walked on the road at the place specified in paragraph (1) at around 21:05, and attempted to take the victim’s right side by the said method, the market value of the victim’s possession, which was the victim’s right side, was 4,90,000 won. However, the Defendants did not commit an attempted crime but did not come to the wind for the police officers who carried out diving service at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of the police statement related to H, D, and G;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographss of seized articles and CCTV images around the scene of the occurrence of the disaster;

1. The investigation report (the report on confirmation of the cell phone market price of opgal opthal S3 mobile phones) is applicable.

arrow