The case reversing the judgment of the court below on the ground that two nursings are sufficient as one nursing person in light of the content and degree of injury and disability.

The case reversing the judgment of the court below on the ground that two nursings are sufficient as one nursing person in light of the content and degree of injury and disability.

Article 763 of the Civil Act

Attorney Lee Young-young et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Shin concrete Industry Co., Ltd., Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Seoul High Court Decision 87Meu515 delivered on January 21, 1987

The part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and that part of the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

The defendant's remaining appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal dismissed shall be assessed against the defendant.

The defendant's attorney's grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the lost portion of profit

In calculating the lost profit according to the rate of loss of labor ability due to the physical disability of the victim injured by other person's tort, the rate of loss of labor ability means the rate of loss of profit determined according to the empirical rule, taking into account all the victim's age, level of education, physical function level and other social and economic conditions, rather than mere medical and physical disability rate, and considering the victim's age, level of education, physical function level, and other social and economic conditions. According to the judgment of the court below, the court below determined that the plaintiff lost the ability of daily work for the general city due to 10% due to the aftermath of the accident of this case, such as the 12 chest pressure pressure and scarcity from the accident of this case, the 9 chest damage.

In light of the records, the above fact-finding and decision of the court below are justified, and there is no error of law such as violation of the rules of evidence, violation of the rules of evidence or the theory of lawsuit against the party members. There is no reason for the argument.

2. As to the opening cost

원심판결에 의하면, 원심은 원심증인 소외 1, 소외 2의 각 일부 증언과 감정인 소외 3의 신체감정일부 결과를 종합하여 원고는 이 사건 사고로 인한 후유증으로 말미암아 그 여명기간 동안 주야간에 걸쳐 일상생활을 개호하여 줄 도시일용노동이 가능한 성인남자 2인이 필요하다고 인정하고 있다. 그런데 위 증인들의 각 증언과 위 감정결과에 의하여 인정되는 개호인의 원고에 대한 개호내용은 매일 1회 무균식염수로 방광을 세척하고, 대번배설을 위하여 항문에 약을 넣어 변기로 받아내고 소변은 도뇨관으로 통을 받아 그 통이 차면 비우며, 오전, 오후 각 1회씩 무릎, 발목관절 부분을 주무르고 따뜻한 물로 덮어주는 내용의 물리치료를 하고, 주 1회 도뇨관을 교환하며, 매월 1회 원고를 데리고 병원에 가서 소변검사, 엑스선검사를 하고 약을 받아 복용시키고, 휄체어로 옮겨 태우는 등의 일이 주된 것으로 보이고, 또 원심이 채택하지 아니한 1심 감정인 소외 4의 신체감정서에 의하면 장보조기와 목발사용으로 단거리 평지보행은 가능하다는 것인바(특히 원심감정인 소외 5의 신체감정서에 의하면 개호인은 1일 8시간 필요할 것으로 사료된다는 것이다), 사실관계가 이와같다면 위 개호행위는 그 내용과 정도에 비추어 특별한 사정이 없는 한 1인의 개호인이 이를 충분히 감당할 수 있는 것으로 보여진다.

As stated in its holding, the court below should have deliberated more on whether there are such special circumstances as above. Ultimately, the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations or violating the rules of evidence, and therefore, it is justified to point out this error.

3. As to the purchase price for the substitute among auxiliary equipment units

According to the judgment of the court below, the court below determined that the plaintiff caused the above aftermathal legacy that the plaintiff caused the above aftermathal erosion to suffer from the above 1850,000 won of market price during the life period.

In light of the records, the above fact-finding and decision of the court below are just, and there is no violation of the rules of evidence against the rules of evidence or the theory of lawsuit. We are without merit.

Therefore, the part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and that part of the case is remanded to the court below for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. The defendant's remaining appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal to the Supreme Court are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Jae-young (Presiding Justice)