The case holding that although it is possible to walk using a language or a part of the daily life and string, but it is deemed necessary to open one adult woman for a life period in view of the physical disability.

The case holding that although it is possible to walk using a language or a part of daily life and string, but it is deemed that there is a need to open one adult woman for the life life during the life period, considering the physical disability.

Articles 763 and 393 of the Civil Act

[Judgment of the court below]

Lee Jong-sik et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Seoul High Court Decision 90Na15985 delivered on October 11, 1990

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

We examine the grounds of appeal.

In light of the records, the court below accepted the judgment below's finding that the plaintiff can see the language or the daily life and neck that the plaintiff sits due to the aftermath of the injury of this case and the fact inquiry report of the appraiser for the best use of the work of this case, but the plaintiff can see the whole purport of the oral argument. But the plaintiff can see the language or neck of the plaintiff due to the aftermath of the injury of this case, the left side is cut from the leaving part, the string can not be carried off due to the complete escape in the slot part, and the string part cannot be carried off due to the string part, and the string part can not be carried out due to the string part, and the defendant's 1 person living in the rural area where the plaintiff Do is living in the rural area where the plaintiff Do could not wear the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part, and there is no error in the misapprehension of the law.

Since the daily life of a person is sitting, standing, lying, standing, and walking continuous action, if the plaintiff's physical disability is the same to the above extent, one person who can complete the above action that is linked to the time and lead a daily life shall be deemed necessary to open, and the opening person shall not be deemed to have been recognized only for the patient as long as it is impossible to move because of the vegetable shots or the vegetables. Accordingly, there is no reason to argue.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim Yong-sung (Presiding Justice)