The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) has not taken a bath at the time or interfered with his/her duties;

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant can sufficiently be recognized that the defendant interfered with the E’s security services, etc. by force with C at the time. Thus, the defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is without merit.

① The Defendant and C (hereinafter “Defendant et al.”) appear to have been out of the room security workers due to drinking problems, etc. in the course of eating and re-entering at a Korean horse race track at H H branch in Korea, along with other daily activities at the time. ② The Defendant et al. demanded refund of 2,000 won before the entrance entrance, etc. before the entrance. The Defendant et al. demanded that the security workers who kept the above entrance door be able to carry out the attack and go through the attack, and avoid disturbance. ③ However, in light of the fact that the notice board on entry to this purport seems to have been seen to have been seen easily by the Defendant et al. on the front of the entrance, etc., the Defendant et al. cannot be deemed to have been justifiable. ④ The video taken up alone does not make clear the Defendant et al.’s desire to avoid any disturbance in the above process, but did not agree with the security manager at the time of leaving the scene.

The court of the court below made a statement to the effect that all two persons expressed their desire, and C also made a police investigation.