1. On February 22, 2013, the Defendant’s deportation order and protection order issued against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 17, 201 on short-term visits (C-3) from June 17, 201 and the same year after having entered the Republic of Korea.

6. 30. On July 5, 201, the Defendant applied for refugee status to the Defendant. On July 5, 2011, the Plaintiff’s status of stay and other (G-1) qualifications were changed.

B. The Plaintiff was working in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C without the Defendant’s permission to engage in activities outside the status of stay and was discovered to the Defendant.

On August 21, 2012, the Defendant issued a notice disposition of a penalty of KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff. On August 24, 2012, the Defendant permitted the Plaintiff to engage in activities other than status of stay, with the permission period up to December 30, 2012.

C. On November 13, 2012, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant refugee status to the Plaintiff. On December 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the said decision with the Minister of Justice on December 24, 2012, and is currently under review.

On December 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for extension of the period of stay with the Defendant for extension of the period of stay and for extension of the permission to engage in activities other than the status of stay. The Defendant permitted the Plaintiff’s extension of the period of stay on the same day, but was denied on January 4, 2013.

E. On February 21, 2013, the Plaintiff continued to serve in the above C and was discovered to the Defendant’s employees. On February 22, 2013, the Defendant issued a deportation order (hereinafter “instant deportation order”) and a protection order (hereinafter “instant protection order”) to the Plaintiff by applying Articles 18(1), 46(1)8, and 63 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same) on the ground that the Plaintiff did not obtain employment permit, on the ground that the Plaintiff engaged in employment activities in the above C without obtaining employment permit.

(hereinafter referred to as “each disposition of this case” in combination with the above deportation order and the protection order. [Ground for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, and