logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.06 2017구합61240
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s entry into and departure from Korea 1) The Plaintiff is the Islamic Republic of Ghana (hereinafter “A”).

(2) On September 20, 200, the Plaintiff, upon entering the Republic of Korea on September 26, 199, entered the Republic of Korea on the expiration date of the period of stay ( December 25, 1999) and staying there on April 29, 200, left the Republic of Korea on May 16, 200 after being subject to a disposition of three (3) years of compulsory departure order and entry restriction, upon the detection of illegal stay. (2) On July 10, 200, the Plaintiff re-enters the Republic of Korea using another person's passport on the departure on July 20, 200, after entering the Republic of Korea on December 20, 200, entered the Republic of Korea using another person's passport, entered the Republic of Korea on December 20, 200 again, and went through a disposition of five (5) years of compulsory departure order and entry restriction.

3) On April 22, 2013, after the expiration of the entry restriction period, the Plaintiff acquired a short-term commercial visa (C-3, and 30 days of sojourn) by inviting the company B to take measures to protect the Defendant from the internment camp as of July 9, 2015, and entered the Republic of Korea on June 11, 2013, after obtaining the permission for extension of the period of sojourn. On June 24, 2014, the Plaintiff again acquired a short-term commercial visa upon the invitation of the said company, and entered the Republic of Korea on June 24, 2014, and thereafter entered the Republic of Korea on July 24, 2014, the expiration date of stay, and was subject to a deportation order and protection order issued by the Seoul Immigration Office on July 8, 2015, the Plaintiff claimed that he/she would be able to receive the Defendant’s religious refugee status under Article 16 of the Protocol, on the ground that he/she could not return to the Republic of Korea.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). 2 The Plaintiff shall be the Plaintiff.

arrow