logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.03.13 2020고단108
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 11, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Busan District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. On November 16, 2019, the Defendant, despite the fact that he violated the provision prohibiting drunk driving as above, was driving a motorcycle without a license plate at approximately 100 meters away from the section of about 100 meters of blood alcohol concentration to the court fishing intersection, located in Busan East-gu, Busan-dong, and located in 28 U.S.-dong, Busan-dong, even though he had a history of violating the provision prohibiting drunk driving.

2. A person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving on a stobane without a license plate;

On November 16, 2019, at around 04:45, the Defendant driven the above Otoba while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.119%, and continued the 28 U.S. court Tribari-ro 28 U.S., Busan East-gu to a retired playground from the back of the university.

At the time, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed for drivers, to live well on the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals, since it was night and at the same time the signal was installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to change the vehicle progress signal to a stop signal, was driven by the victim C (the 61-year old) who was driven pursuant to the left-hand turn signals from the negligence that led to the fact that the vehicle progress signal was driven by the stop signal, and received the right-hand part of the front part of the driver's pande in front of the rocketing other taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant does not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

arrow