All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B, at night on October 12, 2017, she was aware of the fact that Defendant B, while drinking alcohol with E, F, etc. within the 'D' restaurant located in Yansan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City at night.

G contact with G and Defendant A, who sees alcoholic beverages together with G and Defendant A, became a vision, and became out of the said restaurant.

A. On October 13, 2017, Defendant A, while taking part in a trial outside the above restaurant on October 13, 2017, Defendant A assaulted the victim’s face face one time by taking part of the victim F (F, 29 years of age) with his arms in the victim F (F, 29 years of age).

B. Defendant B assaulted the victim A (at the time, 29 years of age) and at the same time and at the places described in the above paragraph (a), the victim A (at the age of 29 years) drinking F, one of his own f, to take the face of the above victim at one time.

2. We examine the judgment, which is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim F voluntarily withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant B after the prosecution of this case was instituted, and the victim F voluntarily withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant B.

Therefore, all of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.