Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On February 20, 2016, the Defendant assaulted Defendant B with the victim A while drinking alcohol at the main point of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and drinking alcohol at the stage, while drinking alcohol at the main point and drinking alcohol at the stage, and the victim said that “afterward”, the Defendant assaulted Defendant B’s face by drinking alcohol.

B. The Defendant, at the same time, and at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), assaulted the victim’s breath by breathing the victim’s breath, following the breath’s breath, and following the breath’s breath, etc.

2. We examine the judgment. Each of the above facts charged against the Defendants is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the Defendants withdrawn their wish to punish the other party on July 13, 2016, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, each of the above facts charged against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.